Monday, April 1, 2019

Three Bullish ESG Stocks This Week

&l;p&g;Weekend closing price trends are an indicator to take notice of. In particularly bullish times, people buy going into the weekend to avoid missing out on good news that will propel prices further. It&s;s just the opposite in bearish time.&a;nbsp;We&s;re not in a bear market&a;nbsp;yet, but Friday&s;s close certainly showed signs of investor being nervous about holding stocks over two full days where bad news may ding their portfolios. This was seen Friday especially in&a;nbsp;small growth-oriented stocks, as the Russell 2000 fell 3.6%.&a;nbsp; Environmental stocks tend to be small and growth focused, so they&s;re volatile like the Russell.&a;nbsp; You may or may not be a buyer at the open Monday, but these are the three most intriguing&a;nbsp;eco stocks to watch this week.

&l;strong&g;Soaring Solar: Enphase Energy (ENPH)&l;/strong&g;

Of the more than 200 environmental stocks I track, solar continues to be the most volatile group - in fact the worst performer Friday was the high-flying Jinko Solar, which fell almost 13%. Then there&s;s &l;a href=&q;https://enphase.com/en-us&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;Enphase Energy&l;/a&g;, a model of calm and steady price appreciation since the start of the year. The chart here shows the past three months of Enphase as the green mountain, and its relative performance to the S&a;amp;P 500, the purple line. The S&a;amp;P has done great &a;ndash; it&s;s up 19% the past three months through Friday. But compared to Enphase, the S&a;amp;P looks plodding. Enphase has almost doubled, from $4.64 just ahead of the end of 2018 to now. Over the past 6 months, it&s;s been the best environmental stock performer relative to the S&a;amp;P, outpacing it by 121%. For&a;nbsp;momentum-minded&a;nbsp;traders &a;ndash; people who buy and hold for weeks to months before selling &a;ndash; relative performance is a wondrous thing, because&a;nbsp;multiple studies show that stocks that outperform over the past six months tend to outperform in the months ahead.&a;nbsp;&l;span&g;Founded in 2006 in California, Enphase makes microinverters, the tech for small scale, residential solar. Investors appear pleased that the company has been reducing costs while improving its gross margin, as this (slightly stale) company &l;a href=&q;https://investor.enphase.com/static-files/cb6f701b-311e-4e9f-be46-b19c648ce4e0&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;presentation&l;/a&g; shows. A larger size of the chart is available &l;a href=&q;http://kinsaleinsights.com/three-bullish-esg-stocks-this-week/&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;here&l;/a&g;.&l;/span&g;

&l;img class=&q;size-medium wp-image-1579&q; src=&q;http://blogs-images.forbes.com/brendancoffey/files/2019/03/ENPH_YahooFinanceChart-1-300x157.jpg?width=960&q; alt=&q;&q; data-height=&q;157&q; data-width=&q;300&q;&g; Enphase compared to the S&a;amp;P500 index over the past three months.

&a;nbsp;

&l;strong&g;Odey Plugs In: PlugPower&l;/strong&g;

&l;a href=&q;https://www.forbes.com/profile/crispin-odey/#3bc51d1b64d3&q;&g;Crispin Odey&l;/a&g; is a classic big bet hedge fund manager,&a;nbsp;and&a;nbsp;tends to boom and bust&a;nbsp;with his investments as a result. Last year his Odey Asset Management&a;nbsp;boomed, with 53% gains. Is he still dealing a hot hand? Last week Odey &l;a href=&q;https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/03/20/1757859/0/en/Plug-Power-Inc-Announces-23-5-Million-Registered-Direct-Offering-With-Odey-Asset-Management.html&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;bought&l;/a&g; 10 million shares of PlugPower in a private placement. Now $23.5 million of shares in anything isn&s;t much to a $5 billion hedge fund (about half a percent of assets), so while Odey may not have bought shares to lose money, by way of caution it&s;s not like it&s;s terribly important to him one way or the other. But it&s;s encouraging nonetheless. &l;a href=&q;https://www.plugpower.com/&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;PlugPower&l;/a&g; is a hydrogen fuel cell company and dominates the hydrogen-cell market, with 95% market share (but be aware there are a number of other equally intriguing companies that use natural gas-based fuel cells). Its main market right now is warehouse forklifts, with cars and delivery vehicles its hoped-for future market. The 12 month daily chart here shows shares basically range-bound until tumbling with everyone else in December, and then rebounding strongly. And look at the volume (the bottom bars), which show increasing interest as shares move higher &a;ndash; a positive. Friday&s;s action showed support and not a lot of selling action, so this is another good sign. There&s;s some resistance&a;nbsp;waiting at $3 a share. A larger version of the chart is &l;a href=&q;http://kinsaleinsights.com/three-bullish-esg-stocks-this-week/&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;here&l;/a&g;.

&l;img class=&q;size-medium wp-image-1581&q; src=&q;http://blogs-images.forbes.com/brendancoffey/files/2019/03/Screen-Shot-2019-03-24-at-4.37.51-PM-300x161.jpg?width=960&q; alt=&q;&q; data-height=&q;161&q; data-width=&q;300&q;&g; PlugPower daily chart with 40-day and 200-day simple moving averages.

&a;nbsp;

&l;strong&g;Canada Clean: TransAlta&l;/strong&g;

&l;a href=&q;https://www.transalta.com/&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;TransAlta&l;/a&g; is an Alberta-based utility that has been pushing hard to transition into renewable energy and away from coal. From a purely climate-change point of view such large scale moves away from coal are essential for the world to head off the worst effects of global warming. By next year, the company is aiming to have its emissions 30% lower than 2015, as it continues into hydro and&a;nbsp;converting its coal plants to run on natural gas, the cleanest option of the fossil fuels. The chart here is a one-month daily chart so the effect is clear: the candlesticks with the small real bodies from Thursday and Friday show the bears don&s;t see much advantage selling off. Plus volume is low&a;nbsp; in the down days and shares are sitting well above the 40-day moving average, the blue line. Utilities tend to be defensive holdings in volatile times, TAC looks like it could be a good option. A larger version of the chart is &l;a href=&q;http://kinsaleinsights.com/three-bullish-esg-stocks-this-week/&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;here&l;/a&g;.

&a;nbsp;

&l;img class=&q;size-medium wp-image-1583&q; src=&q;http://blogs-images.forbes.com/brendancoffey/files/2019/03/koyfin_20190324_044815816-300x150.jpg?width=960&q; alt=&q;&q; data-height=&q;150&q; data-width=&q;300&q;&g; TransAlta one month daily chart with 40-day moving average.&l;/p&g;

Wednesday, March 27, 2019

Buy Morepen Laboratories; target of Rs 24: Keynotes Financial Opiniery


Keynotes Financial Opiniery's research report on Morepen Laboratories


Morepen Laboratories ltd is 31-year-old company. Company went to public in 1993. The first Morepen manufacturing plant was set up on the foothills of the Himalayas in the idyllic surrounding of Parwanoo. More pen's state of art manufacturing facility in the picturesque environs of Baddi comprises a scientifically integrated complex of 10 plants, each with a specific product profile. The company's extensive R &D facilities and factories are manned by a dedicated team of professionals who ensure stringent quality standards. Morepen is exporting products to several countries round the global. The company has shown its presence worldwide by touching almost 40 countries worldwide. The brand name of Dr. Morepen has a front ranking presence in the Wellness category. Its spectrum of popular OTC products, amongst which Burnol, Lemolate, Isabgol.


Outlook


On the basis of Discount Cash Flow Valuation Method, we are recommending 'Buy' for the stock. Since the stock offers good opportunity, we initiate a 'BUY' signal on the stock with 12-month price target of Rs 24/- share an upside of 30% from current levels.


For all recommendations report, click here


Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts/broking houses/rating agencies on moneycontrol.com are their own, and not that of the website or its management. Moneycontrol.com advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decisions.

Read More First Published on Mar 25, 2019 05:25 pm

Thursday, March 21, 2019

Steelcase Inc (SCS) Q4 2019 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Steelcase Inc  (NYSE:SCS)Q4 2019 Earnings Conference CallMarch 20, 2019, 8:30 a.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good day, everyone, and welcome to Steelcase's Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2019 Conference Call. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded.

For opening remarks and introductions, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Mike O'Meara, Director, Investor Relations, Financial Planning & Analysis.

Mike O'Meara -- Director, Investor Relations, Financial Planning & Analysis

Thank you, Sharon. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us for the recap of our fourth quarter and fiscal 2019 financial results. Here with me today are Jim Keane, our President and Chief Executive Officer; and Dave Sylvester, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Our fourth quarter earnings release, which crossed the wires yesterday, is accessible on our website. This conference call is being webcast and this webcast is a copyrighted production of Steelcase Inc. A replay of this webcast will be posted to ir.steelcase.com later today.

Our discussion today may include references to non-GAAP financial measures and forward-looking statements. Reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures and details regarding the risks associated with the use of forward-looking statements are included in our earnings release and we are incorporating, by reference into this conference call, the text of our Safe Harbor statement included in the release. Following our prepared remarks, we will respond to questions from investors and analysts.

I will now turn the call over to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Jim Keane.

James P. Keane -- President and Chief Executive Officer, Director

Thanks, Mike, and good morning, everyone.

Our fourth quarter results exceeded our expectations and contributed to one of the best years we've reported in over a decade. In Q4, we grew sales 18% globally on a reported basis and 15% organically. We showed strong growth across all segments and we believe we gained market share in many major markets around the world. BIFMA is reporting a strong growth across our industry, but our Americas organic revenue growth at 17% was about double the BIFMA's growth rate. Our earnings per share also grew strongly on both reported and adjusted basis, and that's related to improved profitability as well as revenue growth. As we expected, the two price increases we took earlier in the year in response to material inflation helped us to regain some lost gross margins in Q4.

Our EMEA segment was profitable in Q4, as we continue to drive robust top line revenue growth through improved win rates. While that's a sign of good progress, we recognized EMEA was not profitable for the full year. We continue to work on gross margin expansion initiatives that include specific improvements in our product lines, in our selling strategies and in our operational efficiency.

our APAC business is included in the other for segment reporting purposes. I want to recognize our entire team in Asia for delivering a record level of quarterly revenue in Q4. Dave will provide more detail about the quarter and our full-year results.

I want to spend the remainder of my time talking about our outlook, which remains positive. This is supported by our project pipelines, win rates and most of the macro economic factors that we track, such as GDP, unemployment, architectural billings and non residential fixed investment. We were all a bit surprised by the weak February job growth figures in the US. But unemployment rates also fell and pay rates rose. We interpret this as evidence of a very tight job market with likely far more open positions than qualified applicants. This is the war for talent. We hear stories about this every day from our customers. As customers compete for talent, they recognize they need to invest in their workplace. We believe this is helping to drive growth across our industry as seen in the BIFMA growth numbers.

Steelcase is in a particularly strong position to help. Over the last several years, we've invested in new products, new acquisitions and new partnerships aimed at helping our commercial customers compete for talent, shift their culture toward innovation and prepare for digital transformation. We aim to do more than just help with attracting and retaining talent. Our solutions are designed to help customers engage their existing workforce more completely and to help improve productivity, innovation and creativity. That's how you really win the war for talent in the long run.

In the Americas, order growth was very strong in December, but growth was weak in January. The year-over-year volatility could relate to this year's factors like the government shutdown, but also it's last year's factors like the steel tariffs and tax reform. We implemented a price increase in February last year, which caused some pull forward of orders impacting year-over-year comparisons. When we adjust for that, February order growth was better than January. BIFMA is expecting industry growth in North America to be about 3% in calendar 2019, which will be slower growth than 2018. We're targeting to grow a little faster than the industry organically, but the full year effect of our acquisitions adding some inorganic growth on top of that, along with an extra week in the fourth quarter, due to the timing of our year-end.

In EMEA, we see improving overall economic and political conditions in France, slowing growth in Germany, and of course, the disruptive effects of Brexit uncertainty in the UK. We are targeting top line organic growth above the industry, plus the inorganic full year effect of the Orangebox acquisition and continued margin expansion, to bring in EMEA to full year profitability in fiscal 2020.

For APAC, there are signs of slowing economic growth in China, but even a slower growing China is growing faster than other major economies. We expect to continue to make investments to

Tuesday, March 19, 2019

How to Handle a Stock for Maximum Profit Potential When the Unthinkable Happens

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Keith Fitz-GeraldKeith Fitz-Gerald

Folks know to look out for events like earnings, for example, or FOMC meetings, or the regular release of economic data – dates you can look ahead to and circle on a calendar.

But most investors never give a thought to those unpredictable, unthinkable events that don't show up next week in your planner, but explode across global markets in minutes or even seconds flat.

Boeing Co. (NYSE: BA) is a great example.

It's a key defense contractor, and the very definition of a "must have" stock – one that's tied into several key Unstoppable Trends: including technology; war, terrorism, and ugliness; and demographics.

Of course, the company's under extreme pressure at the moment, and existing shareholders have taken a $26.6 billion buzz cut they didn't sign up for.

One day, they buy a company based on super results, super products, or just super potential. Then… WHAM… it gets pounded.

For most investors, a situation like this is unthinkable. For investors like us who have prepared ahead of time, however, a stock like this represents a significant upside opportunity…

Join the conversation. Click here to jump to comments…

Keith Fitz-GeraldKeith Fitz-Gerald

About the Author

Browse Keith's articles | View Keith's research services

Keith Fitz-Gerald has been the Chief Investment Strategist for the Money Morning team since 2007. He's a seasoned market analyst with decades of experience, and a highly accurate track record. Keith regularly travels the world in search of investment opportunities others don't yet see or understand. In addition to heading The Money Map Report, Keith runs High Velocity Profits, which aims to get in, target gains, and get out clean, and he's also the founding editor of Straight Line Profits, a service devoted to revealing the "dark side" of Wall Street... In his weekly Total Wealth, Keith has broken down his 30-plus years of success into three parts: Trends, Risk Assessment, and Tactics – meaning the exact techniques for making money. Sign up is free at totalwealthresearch.com.

… Read full bio

Monday, March 18, 2019

Nexium (NXC) Trading Up 29% Over Last Week

Nexium (CURRENCY:NXC) traded down 2.7% against the U.S. dollar during the 24-hour period ending at 23:00 PM E.T. on March 15th. One Nexium token can now be bought for about $0.0079 or 0.00000198 BTC on major cryptocurrency exchanges including Bittrex and HitBTC. In the last week, Nexium has traded 29% higher against the U.S. dollar. Nexium has a total market capitalization of $524,784.00 and approximately $996.00 worth of Nexium was traded on exchanges in the last day.

Here is how similar cryptocurrencies have performed in the last day:

Get Nexium alerts: XRP (XRP) traded 2% higher against the dollar and now trades at $0.32 or 0.00008001 BTC. Binance Coin (BNB) traded down 0.6% against the dollar and now trades at $15.05 or 0.00377566 BTC. Stellar (XLM) traded 1.7% higher against the dollar and now trades at $0.11 or 0.00002737 BTC. Tether (USDT) traded 0.2% lower against the dollar and now trades at $1.01 or 0.00025320 BTC. TRON (TRX) traded up 2.7% against the dollar and now trades at $0.0234 or 0.00000586 BTC. Bitcoin SV (BSV) traded 7% higher against the dollar and now trades at $70.95 or 0.01780031 BTC. NEO (NEO) traded up 2.2% against the dollar and now trades at $9.48 or 0.00237906 BTC. Crypto.com Chain (CRO) traded up 44.2% against the dollar and now trades at $0.0949 or 0.00002380 BTC. VeChain (VET) traded up 3.5% against the dollar and now trades at $0.0054 or 0.00000135 BTC. Basic Attention Token (BAT) traded up 0.4% against the dollar and now trades at $0.20 or 0.00004930 BTC.

About Nexium

Nexium launched on September 29th, 2016. Nexium’s total supply is 66,509,519 tokens. The official website for Nexium is beyond-the-void.net. Nexium’s official Twitter account is @BeyondVoidGame and its Facebook page is accessible here.

Buying and Selling Nexium

Nexium can be purchased on these cryptocurrency exchanges: HitBTC and Bittrex. It is usually not presently possible to purchase alternative cryptocurrencies such as Nexium directly using US dollars. Investors seeking to trade Nexium should first purchase Ethereum or Bitcoin using an exchange that deals in US dollars such as Changelly, GDAX or Coinbase. Investors can then use their newly-acquired Ethereum or Bitcoin to purchase Nexium using one of the exchanges listed above.

Friday, March 15, 2019

Here's Why Clean Energy Fuels Stock Is Surging 26% Today

What happened

Shares of natural gas and renewable natural gas provider Clean Energy Fuels (NASDAQ:CLNE) are up 25.1% at 12:25 p.m. EDT on March 13, following the release of the company's fourth-quarter and full-year 2018 financial results yesterday after market close. 

The company reported revenue and earnings numbers that both came in ahead of analyst expectations. Fourth-quarter revenue was $96.2 million, up 8% from last year, while GAAP net income came in at $6.9 million, compared to a $28.3 million net loss in the year-ago period. On a per-share basis, that works out to $0.03 earnings per share, while most analysts who cover the stock had projected a small loss. 

Dollar bill folded into an arrow pointed up.

Image source: Getty Images.

So what

It isn't just the solid revenue and GAAP earnings results that have Mr. Market excited today. Because natural gas commodity prices can swing wildly, looking at revenue alone doesn't always show whether the company is actually growing.

A measure that better shows what's happening with demand for its core business -- selling natural gas and renewable natural gas to transportation customers -- is volume, measured in gallon-equivalents, and this metric surged 14.2% higher in the quarter. That was easily the best quarter of volume growth Clean Energy Fuels has recorded in over a year. 

Clean Energy also took yet another big step in strengthening its balance sheet in Q4. At the end of the third quarter, it had $256 million in cash and equivalents, and $239 million in long-term debt and financing lease obligations (with $116 million of that due within 12 months). By the end of the fourth quarter, the debt and capital lease balance was $84.2 million, while cash and equivalents was over $96 million. 

With only $50 million in long-term debt remaining -- and that's not due until July 2020 -- and more cash than debt, Clean Energy's balance sheet is the strongest it's been in years. 

Now what

After a strong quarter of fuel volume growth, management is optimistic about 2019's prospects. On the earnings call, CFO Bob Vreeland said the company expects to see fuel volumes growth in the "low double digits" with per-gallon margins between $0.24 and $0.28, similar to 2018 profitability levels. 

That volume will be generated by the existing infrastructure and cost structure, meaning that the incremental value of those volumes will generate higher operating earnings. Based on the volume outlook, the company expects to generate adjusted EBITDA -- earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization -- of $50 million to $55 million. 

On a GAAP basis, there's a pretty broad range of what earnings could be. A key tax credit -- the alternative fuels tax credit (AFTC) -- expired at the end of 2018. If that tax credit isn't renewed, the company expects a net loss of between $12 million and $18 million (though it would be cash flow positive due to its still-large depreciation/amortization expense). If the AFTC (which has significant bipartisan support and has been retroactively renewed multiple times over the past decade) is renewed, it would be worth between $25 million and $30 million to Clean Energy, directly on the bottom line. 

Add it all up, and it's understandable why the market is so upbeat on Clean Energy today. 

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) Stock Rating Upgraded by Zacks Investment Research

Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ:FITB) was upgraded by Zacks Investment Research from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a research report issued on Tuesday. The firm currently has a $30.00 target price on the financial services provider’s stock. Zacks Investment Research‘s target price indicates a potential upside of 8.13% from the company’s previous close.

According to Zacks, “Shares of Fifth Third have outperformed the industry over the past three months. Also, the company has an impressive earnings surprise history, having beaten the Zacks Consensus Estimate in all the trailing four quarters. The company’s ongoing strategic efforts, such as Project North Star, will likely boost its efficiency and revenues over the long run. Also, margin pressure seems to be easing gradually due to the Fed’s interest rate hikes and improving economic backdrop. However, elevated expenses on the company’s branch digitization initiative and legal issues remain headwinds. Also, significant exposure to commercial loans remains a concern. Nevertheless, the company's involvement in steady capital deployment activities remains impressive.”

Get Fifth Third Bancorp alerts:

A number of other research firms also recently issued reports on FITB. BidaskClub upgraded shares of Fifth Third Bancorp from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Saturday, January 19th. Bank of America set a $29.00 target price on shares of Fifth Third Bancorp and gave the company a “hold” rating in a research report on Wednesday, January 23rd. ValuEngine raised shares of Fifth Third Bancorp from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a research report on Tuesday, January 22nd. Morgan Stanley cut their price objective on shares of Fifth Third Bancorp from $32.00 to $30.00 and set an “equal weight” rating for the company in a research report on Tuesday, December 11th. Finally, Raymond James set a $30.00 target price on shares of Fifth Third Bancorp and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a report on Wednesday, January 23rd. Two investment analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, eleven have issued a hold rating and seven have issued a buy rating to the company’s stock. The stock presently has a consensus rating of “Hold” and a consensus price target of $31.27.

FITB traded up $0.68 during midday trading on Tuesday, hitting $27.75. The company had a trading volume of 6,213,110 shares, compared to its average volume of 5,865,306. The company has a current ratio of 0.88, a quick ratio of 0.88 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.97. The stock has a market capitalization of $18.25 billion, a PE ratio of 10.92, a PEG ratio of 1.31 and a beta of 1.32. Fifth Third Bancorp has a twelve month low of $22.12 and a twelve month high of $34.67.

Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ:FITB) last issued its quarterly earnings results on Tuesday, January 22nd. The financial services provider reported $0.69 EPS for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate of $0.67 by $0.02. Fifth Third Bancorp had a net margin of 27.32% and a return on equity of 12.34%. The company had revenue of $1.66 billion during the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $1.66 billion. During the same quarter in the previous year, the company earned $0.48 EPS. On average, research analysts predict that Fifth Third Bancorp will post 2.76 EPS for the current year.

A number of institutional investors and hedge funds have recently added to or reduced their stakes in FITB. SRS Capital Advisors Inc. lifted its holdings in shares of Fifth Third Bancorp by 82.1% in the 4th quarter. SRS Capital Advisors Inc. now owns 1,080 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $25,000 after buying an additional 487 shares during the period. JOYN Advisors Inc. increased its stake in shares of Fifth Third Bancorp by 38.6% during the 4th quarter. JOYN Advisors Inc. now owns 1,722 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $41,000 after purchasing an additional 480 shares in the last quarter. Executive Wealth Management LLC purchased a new stake in Fifth Third Bancorp in the 4th quarter worth approximately $69,000. Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund grew its stake in shares of Fifth Third Bancorp by 2,225.3% during the 4th quarter. Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund now owns 1,765,315 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $75,000 after buying an additional 1,689,396 shares during the period. Finally, Lindbrook Capital LLC purchased a new stake in shares of Fifth Third Bancorp during the 4th quarter valued at $75,000. Institutional investors own 79.91% of the company’s stock.

About Fifth Third Bancorp

Fifth Third Bancorp operates as a diversified financial services company in the United States. The company's Commercial Banking segment offers credit intermediation, cash management, and financial services; lending and depository products; and cash management, foreign exchange and international trade finance, derivatives and capital markets services, asset-based lending, real estate finance, public finance, commercial leasing, and syndicated finance for business, government, and professional customers.

See Also: What is the balance sheet?

Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB)

For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Analyst Recommendations for Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ:FITB)

Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Head-To-Head Survey: Workhorse Group (WKHS) vs. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCAU)

Workhorse Group (NASDAQ:WKHS) and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (NYSE:FCAU) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Get Workhorse Group alerts:

Workhorse Group has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles has a beta of 1.91, indicating that its share price is 91% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

9.7% of Workhorse Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.3% of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Workhorse Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Workhorse Group and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles’ net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Workhorse Group -499.90% -1,564.64% -241.24%
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles 3.15% 21.83% 5.02%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Workhorse Group and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Workhorse Group 0 0 2 0 3.00
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles 0 5 5 0 2.50

Workhorse Group presently has a consensus target price of $4.00, indicating a potential upside of 334.78%. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles has a consensus target price of $21.07, indicating a potential upside of 46.29%. Given Workhorse Group’s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Workhorse Group is more favorable than Fiat Chrysler Automobiles.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Workhorse Group and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles’ top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Workhorse Group $10.85 million 4.94 -$41.21 million ($1.09) -0.84
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles $136.30 billion 0.21 $4.29 billion $3.78 3.81

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles has higher revenue and earnings than Workhorse Group. Workhorse Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles beats Workhorse Group on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

About Workhorse Group

Workhorse Group Inc. designs, manufactures, builds, sells, and leases battery-electric vehicles and aircraft in the United States. It operates through two divisions, Automotive and Aviation. The company also develops cloud-based and real-time telematics performance monitoring systems that enable fleet operators to optimize energy and route efficiency. Its products include electric cargo vans, and medium and light-duty pickup trucks, as well as HorseFly delivery drones and truck systems. The company was formerly known as AMP Holding Inc. and changed its name to Workhorse Group Inc. in April 2015. Workhorse Group Inc. was founded in 2007 and is headquartered in Loveland, Ohio.

About Fiat Chrysler Automobiles

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V., together with its subsidiaries, designs, engineers, manufactures, distributes, and sells vehicles, components, and production systems. The company operates through five segments: NAFTA, LATAM, APAC, EMEA, and Maserati. It provides passenger cars, SUV vehicles, trucks, and light commercial vehicles under the Jeep, Ram, Dodge, Chrysler, Fiat, Fiat Professional, Alfa Romeo, and Abarth brands; and luxury vehicles under the Maserati brand, as well as related service parts and accessories, and service contracts under the Mopar brand. The company also provides cast iron components for engines, gearboxes, transmissions and suspension systems, aluminum cylinder heads, and engine blocks under the Teksid brand; and designs and produces industrial automation systems and related products for the automotive industry under the Comau brand name. In addition, it provides retail and dealer financings, and leasing and rental services; and factoring services. The company sells its products directly, or through distributors and dealers in approximately 135 countries. The company was formerly known as Fiat S.p.A. and changed its name to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. in October 2014. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. was founded in 1899 and is based in London, the United Kingdom.

Sunday, March 10, 2019

Top 10 Gold Stocks To Own Right Now

tags:ORE,NXG,GSS,NGD,CME,

U.S. equities fell on Thursday amid doubts over the fate of the GOP’s tax cut plans. The doubt hit investors after a number of Republican senators expressed reservations about the amount of the child tax credit.

In the end, the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 0.3%, the S&P 500 lost 0.4%, the Nasdaq Composite lost 0.3% and the Russell 2000 lost 1.2%. Treasury bonds were weaker, the dollar outperformed, gold gained 0.7% and crude oil added 0.8%.

Top 10 Gold Stocks To Own Right Now: Orezone Gold Corp (ORE)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Galactrum (CURRENCY:ORE) traded 1.7% lower against the U.S. dollar during the 24 hour period ending at 18:00 PM Eastern on August 31st. Galactrum has a total market capitalization of $866,847.00 and approximately $5,272.00 worth of Galactrum was traded on exchanges in the last 24 hours. One Galactrum coin can now be purchased for about $0.42 or 0.00006032 BTC on major exchanges including Stocks.Exchange and Cryptopia. In the last seven days, Galactrum has traded 12.5% higher against the U.S. dollar.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Galactrum (ORE) is a PoW/PoS coin that uses the
    Lyra2RE hashing algorithm. It launched on November 11th, 2017. Galactrum’s total supply is 2,092,679 coins and its circulating supply is 1,372,679 coins. Galactrum’s official Twitter account is @galactrum. Galactrum’s official website is galactrum.org.

  • [By Jim Robertson]

    Finally, Richard Seville, the CEO of Brisbane-based Orocobre Ltd (ASX: ORE) which began lithium sales in 2015 from northern Argentina and also experienced difficulty boosting output, commented that an "inability to access traditional funds has delayed the development of the sector" and that "these projects aren't easy -- so the banks just don't want to go there."

Top 10 Gold Stocks To Own Right Now: Northgate Minerals Corporation(NXG)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Shares of NEX Group PLC (LON:NXG) have been given an average rating of “Hold” by the nine ratings firms that are presently covering the company, Marketbeat.com reports. One research analyst has rated the stock with a sell recommendation, four have assigned a hold recommendation and four have assigned a buy recommendation to the company. The average 1 year price objective among analysts that have issued ratings on the stock in the last year is GBX 696 ($9.21).

Top 10 Gold Stocks To Own Right Now: Golden Star Resources Ltd(GSS)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Golden Star Resources Ltd. (TSE:GSC) (NYSE:GSS) has been given an average recommendation of “Buy” by the six ratings firms that are presently covering the stock, Marketbeat reports. One research analyst has rated the stock with a hold recommendation and three have issued a buy recommendation on the company. The average 12 month price objective among analysts that have issued ratings on the stock in the last year is C$1.48.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Golden Star Resources Ltd. (NYSEAMERICAN:GSS) was the target of a significant increase in short interest in September. As of September 28th, there was short interest totalling 10,021,831 shares, an increase of 6.9% from the September 14th total of 9,371,344 shares. Based on an average trading volume of 1,038,207 shares, the short-interest ratio is presently 9.7 days. Approximately 4.7% of the company’s shares are sold short.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Golden Star Resources (GSS)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Golden Star Resources (GSS)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Golden Star Resources (GSS)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Top 10 Gold Stocks To Own Right Now: NEW GOLD INC.(NGD)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. downgraded shares of New Gold (NYSEAMERICAN:NGD) from a neutral rating to an underweight rating in a research report released on Wednesday, The Fly reports.

  • [By WWW.GURUFOCUS.COM]

    For the details of Exor Investments (UK) LLP's stock buys and sells, go to http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?GuruName=Exor+Investments+%28UK%29+LLP

    These are the top 5 holdings of Exor Investments (UK) LLPSibanye-Stillwater (SBGL) - 45,970,311 shares, 32.51% of the total portfolio. Shares added by 8.09%VEON Ltd (VEON) - 37,657,792 shares, 31.02% of the total portfolio. Shares added by 3.83%Cameco Corp (CCJ) - 5,967,410 shares, 19.32% of the total portfolio. Harmony Gold Mining Co Ltd (HMY) - 13,275,728 shares, 6.26% of the total portfolio. Shares added by 6.84%Novagold Resources Inc (NG) - 5,889,905 shares, 6.21% of the total portfolio. Shares
  • [By Lisa Levin]

    Check out these big penny stock gainers and losers

    Losers Teradyne, Inc. (NYSE: TER) fell 10.8 percent to $37.02 in pre-market trading after the company issued downbeat Q2 guidance. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (NYSE: EW) fell 9.2 percent to $122.29 in pre-market trading. Edwards Lifesciences reported better-than-expected results for its first quarter, but issued weak earnings guidance for the second quarter. New Gold Inc. (NYSE: NGD) fell 8.8 percent to $2.30 in pre-market trading after rising 4.13 percent on Tuesday. Gold Fields Limited (ADR) (NYSE: GFI) fell 8.6 percent to $3.61 in pre-market trading. Natus Medical Incorporated (NASDAQ: BABY) fell 8.2 percent to $32.95 in pre-market trading after the company issued weak forecast for the second quarter. Atossa Genetics Inc. (NASDAQ: ATOS) shares fell 7.9 percent to $3.50 in pre-market trading after climbing 27.09 percent on Tuesday. Bright Scholar Education Holdings Limited (NYSE: BEDU) shares fell 6.7 percent to $13.58 in pre-market trading after reporting Q1 results. Sangamo Therapeutics Inc (NASDAQ: SGMO) fell 5.9 percent to $16.75 in pre-market trading following announcement of a $200 million common stock offering. Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd (NASDAQ: FRSX) shares fell 5.7 percent to $3.29 in pre-market trading after declining 3.32 percent on Tuesday. Euronav NV (NYSE: EURN) fell 4.8 percent to $8.40 in pre-market trading. Limelight Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: LLNW) shares fell 4.3 percent to $4.69 in pre-market trading. Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc (NASDAQ: GLPI) shares fell 4.1 percent to $32.92 in pre-market trading after the company issued downbeat quarterly results and reported the retirement of CFO William Clifford

Top 10 Gold Stocks To Own Right Now: CME Group Inc.(CME)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Investors sold shares of CME Group Inc (NASDAQ:CME) on strength during trading hours on Wednesday. $43.03 million flowed into the stock on the tick-up and $84.28 million flowed out of the stock on the tick-down, for a money net flow of $41.25 million out of the stock. Of all stocks tracked, CME Group had the 11th highest net out-flow for the day. CME Group traded up $0.26 for the day and closed at $170.48

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    KAMES CAPITAL plc cut its position in CME Group Inc (NASDAQ:CME) by 1.7% in the third quarter, HoldingsChannel reports. The firm owned 511,147 shares of the financial services provider’s stock after selling 8,580 shares during the period. CME Group accounts for approximately 2.1% of KAMES CAPITAL plc’s investment portfolio, making the stock its 12th biggest holding. KAMES CAPITAL plc’s holdings in CME Group were worth $87,002,000 as of its most recent filing with the SEC.

  • [By ]

    Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) : "That's an ideal stock for this market. I like the choice."

    Aqua America (WTR) : "This is not the stock for a hot economy, even though this is a well-run company."

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    CME Group Inc (NASDAQ:CME) Director Ronald A. Pankau sold 260 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction dated Thursday, August 9th. The shares were sold at an average price of $163.17, for a total transaction of $42,424.20. Following the transaction, the director now directly owns 3,900 shares in the company, valued at approximately $636,363. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which is accessible through the SEC website.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Commonwealth Bank of Australia raised its holdings in CME Group Inc (NASDAQ:CME) by 18.2% during the 2nd quarter, according to its most recent disclosure with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The institutional investor owned 26,969 shares of the financial services provider’s stock after purchasing an additional 4,160 shares during the period. Commonwealth Bank of Australia’s holdings in CME Group were worth $4,413,000 at the end of the most recent reporting period.

Saturday, March 9, 2019

A Trade Deal Will Not Make A Dent In Trump's Trade Deficit

&l;p&g;&l;img class=&q;dam-image ap size-large wp-image-76fb67d0793849b8afa69912fb53ffe5&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/76fb67d0793849b8afa69912fb53ffe5/960x0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;586&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; A container ship is unloaded at the Port of Oakland in California. The U.S. trade deficit with China broke a record last year as companies raced to import more goods from China ahead of tariffs.&a;nbsp; (AP Photo/Ben Margot, File) photo credit: ASSOCIATED PRESS

How will a trade deal with China make a dent in the ballooning deficit the U.S. has with the rest of the world, led of course by the world&s;s No. 2 economy across the Pacific Ocean?

Even if China promised to double its exports of U.S. agricultural commodities, that would just cut $30 billion in a yawning $419 billion trade gap. It&s;s not even a 10% dent! China is basically importing U.S. raw materials, adding value to those raw materials, and selling them back to the U.S. Who and what is going to change that?

Maybe the U.S. can sell product elsewhere to lower its overall trade deficit?

Oh wait, Europe&s;s economy is shrinking and few see the richest countries in the world growing over 2% anytime soon. By the way, we have a deficit with Europe.

Japan is a zero growth economy, and we have a steady mid-$60 billion deficit with them, too. Maybe we can sell them more LNG and beef (more commodities).

Speaking of commodities, we&s;ve got emerging markets. They&s;re growing. Brazil is inching up and we have a tiny $8 billion surplus with them plus tariffs on their steel. Russia faces sanctions and is not really a market for the U.S. when looked at from a big picture perspective. We don&s;t usually buy their oil. We are not even a big buyer of their aluminum.

&l;img class=&q;dam-image bloomberg size-large wp-image-43344168&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/43344168/960x0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;639&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; President Donald Trump has made tariffs the centerpiece of his trade war strategy. Part of the goal of the China trade war is to lower the trade deficit with China, as stated numerous times by the president. Photographer: Alex Edelman/Bloomberg photo credit: &a;copy; 2019 Bloomberg Finance LP

We have a $21 billion deficit with India.

Who does that leave? What major market is increasingly buying Made in the U.S.A. today? Meanwhile, the U.S. economy, the strongest economy in the developed world, keeps buying from abroad. How does 25% tariffs on China change the equation in the trade deficit?

Two years ago we didn&s;t have 10% tariffs on China. Now we do, and the trade gap widens and widens.

&l;strong&g;See: &l;a href=&q;https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/07/business/us-china-trade-deal.html&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;Chinese Officials Becoming Wary Of Quick Trade Deal&l;/a&g; -- The New York Times&l;/strong&g;

&l;img class=&q;dam-image ap size-large wp-image-d6459818440349379bf4adf2ab465ecb&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/d6459818440349379bf4adf2ab465ecb/960x0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;639&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, center, shakes hands with Chinese President Xi Jinping next to U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, left, before their meeting at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, Friday, Feb. 15, 2019. (AP Photo/Andy Wong, Pool) photo credit: ASSOCIATED PRESS

Some U.S. companies feel they cannot compete with China. Not because they are not qualified to do so, but because they are playing baseball and China is playing football. Yet, they are playing the game on the same field.

If Trump thinks the trade deficit is an indicator of his success -- or failure -- in his trade war with China, then one can imagine he will want to hike tariffs to 25%, seeing how previous hikes did nothing to change the supply chain in favor of American manufacturing.

Tim Brightbell, a partner with trade law firm Wiley Rein in Washington, is representing the American Kitchen Cabinet Alliance in (AKCA) its new trade fight with China. They filed a trade claim with the U.S. International Trade Commission on Wednesday. It&s;s not the sexiest industry, but it is one every American has a relationship with as every home, even a mobile home, has cabinetry. The 25 member companies in the AKCA say their sales are falling despite more home building and it is because of Chinese imports.

&q;Chinese imports of kitchen cabinets are a couple billion dollars, but they are up 75% since 2015 and that&a;rsquo;s just in two and a half years,&q; he says. &q;Our trade deficit goes up because we send them the cheaper wood and they send us the cabinets. We are becoming a low-cost assembly worker to Chinese cabinetry. This harms U.S. industries and you can see this in the trade deficit.&q;

The U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis &l;a href=&q;https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/Press-Release/current_press_release/ft900.pdf&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;announced yesterday&l;/a&g; that the goods and services deficit with U.S. trading partners was $59.8 billion in December, up $9.5 billion from $50.3 billion in November.

December exports were $205.1 billion, $3.9 billion &l;em&g;less&l;/em&g; than November exports. December imports were $264.9 billion, $5.5 billion &l;em&g;more&l;/em&g; than November imports.

Industrial supplies and materials decreased $2.1 billion in December. Crude oil decreased $0.5 billion. Fuel oil decreased $0.4 billion. Capital goods decreased by $1.7 billion. Civilian aircraft decreased $1 billion. Exports of services decreased by around $500 million to $69.5 billion in December.

&l;img class=&q;dam-image ap size-large wp-image-4108f311ef294b3c8a63309b1909d61f&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/4108f311ef294b3c8a63309b1909d61f/960x0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;605&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; Even oil exports are not enough to reduce the U.S. trade gap with China and the rest of the world&s;s major economies. (AP Photo/Matt Slocum, File) photo credit: ASSOCIATED PRESS

Meanwhile, American companies were buying $2.7 billion more in capital goods in December alone. Computer accessories and computers increased by $700 million each. Consumer goods increased by $2.4 billion. Household and kitchen appliances imports rose by another $700 million.

For the year, the U.S. sold $74.2 billion worth of industrial supplies and materials. Crude oil increased by sales to $24.6 billion. Capital goods increased by $28.7 billion.

Overall, year-ending exports of goods increased by $118.5 billion to $1,671.8 billion in 2018. Imports of goods doubled that, up $202.2 billion to $2,563.1 billion in 2018.

As a result, the deficit with China increased $43.6 billion to $419.2 billion in 2018. China bought $9.6 billion less American goods for a total of $120.3 billion but the U.S. bought $34 billion more from China, partially due to companies frontrunning tariffs, for a total of $539.5 billion.

Even European Union trade registered a &l;span&g;$17.9 billion deficit spike to $169.3 billion in 2018. Exports did well, increasing by $35.4 billion to $318.6 billion but once again we bought much more than they did. U.S. imports of E.U. goods rose $53.3 billion to $487.9 billion.

&l;/span&g;

With China, you can say that the U.S. is simply much richer and so of course we can afford to buy much more. Plus we have over two decades of U.S. multinationals assemblying goods there and exporting back home.

But Europe is rich, and they are rushing to buy American. It&s;s a slow growing, if not stagnant, market.

China is the growth story. But they&s;re kind of only shopping here on vacation.

At best, tariffs have become a new source of revenue for the government. They have not nothing to reverse trade trends, judging by the data.

&l;img class=&q;dam-image ap size-large wp-image-760e3b9ffa864b88946da888c388ad13&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/760e3b9ffa864b88946da888c388ad13/960x0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;653&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; Soybeans are a major U.S. export to China. If China doubled their imports of American soy -- much to the dismay of their other supplier, Brazil, it would only cut about $12 billion from the trade deficit, around around 2% of the overall gap between the two countries, based on Census data. (AP Photo/Michael Conroy) photo credit: ASSOCIATED PRESS

Given that the trade deficit is the Trump administration&a;rsquo;s main metric for whether trade policy is fair or not, these figures are likely be spur a more hawkish China policy, Panjiva Research analysts said in a note to clients on Thursday.

Until the U.S. can get China to buy more from the U.S., or make U.S. companies richer for doing business in China at the very least, then the risk of tariff escalation cannot be discounted.

&a;ldquo;The (trade) team is still continuing to negotiate because we still have a lot to do,&a;rdquo; Commerce Minister Zhong Shan reportedly said during this week&s;s National People&a;rsquo;s Congress.&a;nbsp; Senior Chinese officials have been taking turns warning that challenges remain in regards to trade, &l;a href=&q;https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/07/business/us-china-trade-deal.html&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;&l;em&g;The New York Times&l;/em&g; reported today from Beijing. &l;/a&g;The worries over trade policy in Beijing is starting to put in doubt plans for President Xi Jinping to meet with Trump in late March or early April to sign a deal, the Times reported.

Wednesday&s;s trade balance data has given the Trump administration another reason to push China towards a deal on&a;nbsp;&l;a href=&q;https://panjiva.com/research/trumps-8-4-billion-agricultural-ask-will-have-to-wait-for-an-answer/24957&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;agricultural tariffs&l;/a&g;, too.

According to Panjiva Research, to cut the trade deficit with China back to its 2016 level requires a 63.4% increase in U.S. exports from their 2018 level.&l;/p&g;

Friday, March 8, 2019

Seacor (CKH) Upgraded to “Strong-Buy” by Zacks Investment Research

Seacor (NYSE:CKH) was upgraded by Zacks Investment Research from a “hold” rating to a “strong-buy” rating in a research note issued to investors on Wednesday. The brokerage presently has a $49.00 price objective on the oil and gas company’s stock. Zacks Investment Research‘s price target points to a potential upside of 17.59% from the stock’s current price.

According to Zacks, “SEACOR Holdings Inc. is a diversified holding company principally focused on domestic and international transportation, logistics, and risk management consultancy. SEACOR provides its customers with highly responsive services focused on innovative technology, modern efficient equipment, and dedicated, highly trained professionals. As the parent company of a global, diversified family of companies, SEACOR has the ability to utilize its subsidiaries’ assets to provide customers with the highest level of service within the industries in which it operates. SEACOR also maintains strategic joint venture arrangements in various geographic locations around the world, enhancing its existing business lines while satisfying specific customer requirements with resources such as logistical support, assets, and personnel. SEACOR engages in the operation of a fleet of offshore vessels in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, the North Sea, West Africa, Asia, Latin America and other regions. “

Get Seacor alerts:

Other analysts have also issued research reports about the stock. TheStreet lowered shares of Seacor from a “b-” rating to a “c+” rating in a research note on Friday, December 7th. ValuEngine raised shares of Seacor from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Friday, February 8th.

CKH stock traded down $0.82 during trading on Wednesday, hitting $41.67. 85,900 shares of the company’s stock traded hands, compared to its average volume of 62,673. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.44, a current ratio of 2.07 and a quick ratio of 2.05. Seacor has a 52 week low of $34.63 and a 52 week high of $59.00. The firm has a market cap of $873.48 million, a price-to-earnings ratio of 31.33 and a beta of 0.76.

Seacor (NYSE:CKH) last released its earnings results on Wednesday, February 27th. The oil and gas company reported ($0.26) earnings per share for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $0.54 by ($0.80). Seacor had a net margin of 16.80% and a return on equity of 3.88%. As a group, analysts expect that Seacor will post 1.65 EPS for the current fiscal year.

Several institutional investors and hedge funds have recently made changes to their positions in the company. Vanguard Group Inc. boosted its holdings in shares of Seacor by 2.6% during the third quarter. Vanguard Group Inc. now owns 1,666,627 shares of the oil and gas company’s stock valued at $82,349,000 after acquiring an additional 42,815 shares during the period. Vanguard Group Inc boosted its holdings in shares of Seacor by 2.6% during the third quarter. Vanguard Group Inc now owns 1,666,627 shares of the oil and gas company’s stock valued at $82,349,000 after acquiring an additional 42,815 shares during the period. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP boosted its holdings in shares of Seacor by 0.7% during the third quarter. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP now owns 1,533,656 shares of the oil and gas company’s stock valued at $75,778,000 after acquiring an additional 11,355 shares during the period. Royce & Associates LP boosted its holdings in shares of Seacor by 7.7% during the fourth quarter. Royce & Associates LP now owns 1,420,797 shares of the oil and gas company’s stock valued at $52,569,000 after acquiring an additional 101,134 shares during the period. Finally, Renaissance Technologies LLC boosted its holdings in shares of Seacor by 12.5% during the third quarter. Renaissance Technologies LLC now owns 1,101,500 shares of the oil and gas company’s stock valued at $54,425,000 after acquiring an additional 122,800 shares during the period. 91.88% of the stock is owned by institutional investors.

Seacor Company Profile

SEACOR Holdings Inc, a diversified holding company, engages in transportation, and logistics and risk management consultancy businesses in the United States and internationally. The company's Ocean Transportation & Logistics Services segment owns and operates a diversified fleet of marine transportation, and towing and bunkering assets.

Further Reading: Market Capitalization in the Stock Market

Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Seacor (CKH)

For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Thursday, March 7, 2019

Comparing Irhythm Technologies (IRTC) and Boston Scientific (BSX)

Boston Scientific (NYSE:BSX) and Irhythm Technologies (NASDAQ:IRTC) are both medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

Get Boston Scientific alerts:

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Boston Scientific and Irhythm Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Boston Scientific 0 2 21 2 3.00
Irhythm Technologies 0 4 5 0 2.56

Boston Scientific presently has a consensus target price of $40.80, suggesting a potential upside of 2.56%. Irhythm Technologies has a consensus target price of $101.14, suggesting a potential upside of 10.43%. Given Irhythm Technologies’ higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Irhythm Technologies is more favorable than Boston Scientific.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Boston Scientific and Irhythm Technologies’ revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Boston Scientific $9.82 billion 5.61 $1.67 billion $1.47 27.06
Irhythm Technologies $147.29 million 15.04 -$48.28 million ($1.89) -48.46

Boston Scientific has higher revenue and earnings than Irhythm Technologies. Irhythm Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boston Scientific, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Boston Scientific has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Irhythm Technologies has a beta of 1.77, meaning that its share price is 77% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Boston Scientific and Irhythm Technologies’ net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Boston Scientific 17.01% 25.92% 10.27%
Irhythm Technologies -32.78% -66.24% -37.49%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

91.3% of Boston Scientific shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.0% of Irhythm Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Boston Scientific shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Irhythm Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Boston Scientific beats Irhythm Technologies on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Boston Scientific Company Profile

Boston Scientific Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets medical devices for use in various interventional medical specialties worldwide. It operates through three segments: Cardiovascular, Rhythm Management, and MedSurg. The company offers interventional cardiology products, including drug-eluting coronary stent systems used in the treatment of coronary artery disease; percutaneous coronary interventions therapy products to treat atherosclerosis; intravascular catheter-directed ultrasound imaging catheters, fractional flow reserve devices, and systems for use in coronary arteries and heart chambers, as well as certain peripheral vessels; and structural heart therapy systems. It also provides stents, balloon catheters, wires, and atherectomy systems to treat arterial diseases; thrombectomy systems, wires, and stents to treat venous diseases; and peripheral embolization devices, microcatheters, and drainage catheters to treat various cancers. In addition, the company offers cardiac rhythm management devices, such as implantable cardioverter defibrillator systems to treat abnormalities; remote patient management system; implantable cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker systems; and medical technologies to diagnose and treat rate and rhythm disorders of the heart comprising ablation catheters, intracardiac ultrasound catheters, diagnostic catheters, delivery sheaths, mapping system, and other accessories. Further, it provides products to diagnose and treat diseases of the gastrointestinal and pulmonary conditions; devices to diagnose, treat, and palliate pulmonary diseases within the airway and lungs; and products to treat various urological and pelvic conditions; deep brain stimulation systems for the treatment of parkinson's disease, tremor, and intractable primary and secondary dystonia; and spinal cord stimulator systems for the management of chronic pain. The company was founded in 1979 and is headquartered in Marlborough, Massachusetts.

Irhythm Technologies Company Profile

iRhythm Technologies, Inc., a digital healthcare company, provides ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring products for patients at risk for arrhythmias in the United States. The company offers Zio service, an ambulatory cardiac monitoring solution that combines a wire-free, patch-based, and wearable biosensor with a cloud-based data analytic platform to help physicians to monitor patients and diagnose arrhythmias. Its Zio XT monitor, a single-use, wire-free, and wearable patch-based biosensor, records patient's heartbeats and ECG data. The company was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

Wednesday, March 6, 2019

TopBuild Corp (BLD) Forecasted to Post Q3 2019 Earnings of $1.41 Per Share

TopBuild Corp (NYSE:BLD) – Jefferies Financial Group lifted their Q3 2019 earnings per share (EPS) estimates for shares of TopBuild in a research note issued to investors on Wednesday, February 27th. Jefferies Financial Group analyst P. Ng now forecasts that the construction company will post earnings per share of $1.41 for the quarter, up from their previous forecast of $1.36. Jefferies Financial Group also issued estimates for TopBuild’s Q4 2019 earnings at $1.40 EPS, FY2019 earnings at $4.79 EPS and FY2020 earnings at $5.41 EPS.

Get TopBuild alerts:

Several other equities research analysts also recently weighed in on the company. Zacks Investment Research downgraded TopBuild from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research report on Tuesday, November 6th. SunTrust Banks decreased their target price on TopBuild to $70.00 and set a “buy” rating for the company in a research report on Wednesday, November 7th. KeyCorp set a $67.00 target price on TopBuild and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Monday, November 12th. Nomura set a $66.00 target price on TopBuild and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Monday, December 17th. Finally, ValuEngine raised TopBuild from a “strong sell” rating to a “sell” rating in a research report on Friday, December 21st. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, three have assigned a hold rating and seven have issued a buy rating to the company. TopBuild currently has a consensus rating of “Buy” and a consensus target price of $78.91.

Shares of NYSE:BLD opened at $61.67 on Monday. The stock has a market cap of $2.06 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 14.72, a PEG ratio of 0.53 and a beta of 1.04. The company has a quick ratio of 1.22, a current ratio of 1.59 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.66. TopBuild has a 12 month low of $41.27 and a 12 month high of $87.21.

TopBuild (NYSE:BLD) last announced its quarterly earnings results on Tuesday, February 26th. The construction company reported $1.20 EPS for the quarter, topping the Thomson Reuters’ consensus estimate of $1.19 by $0.01. The company had revenue of $639.55 million during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $647.95 million. TopBuild had a return on equity of 13.22% and a net margin of 8.96%. The firm’s revenue was up 27.6% on a year-over-year basis. During the same period in the prior year, the firm posted $0.84 earnings per share.

Hedge funds and other institutional investors have recently modified their holdings of the company. Norges Bank purchased a new position in TopBuild in the fourth quarter valued at about $20,513,000. Aurora Investment Counsel boosted its holdings in TopBuild by 14.3% in the fourth quarter. Aurora Investment Counsel now owns 22,580 shares of the construction company’s stock valued at $1,016,000 after purchasing an additional 2,830 shares during the last quarter. Nordea Investment Management AB boosted its holdings in TopBuild by 15.1% in the fourth quarter. Nordea Investment Management AB now owns 84,228 shares of the construction company’s stock valued at $3,791,000 after purchasing an additional 11,054 shares during the last quarter. Amalgamated Bank purchased a new position in TopBuild in the fourth quarter valued at about $249,000. Finally, Millennium Management LLC purchased a new position in TopBuild in the fourth quarter valued at about $1,119,000. 92.35% of the stock is owned by institutional investors.

In other news, VP John S. Peterson sold 10,930 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Monday, March 4th. The stock was sold at an average price of $60.36, for a total value of $659,734.80. Following the completion of the sale, the vice president now owns 45,126 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $2,723,805.36. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available through this link. Also, COO Robert M. Buck sold 14,677 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Thursday, February 28th. The stock was sold at an average price of $58.66, for a total value of $860,952.82. Following the completion of the sale, the chief operating officer now directly owns 60,142 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $3,527,929.72. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. 1.40% of the stock is owned by corporate insiders.

About TopBuild

TopBuild Corp. engages in the installation, distribution, and sale of insulation and other building products to the United States construction industry. The company operates in two segments, Installation and Distribution. It offers rain gutters, garage doors, fireplaces, fireproofing and firestopping products, shower enclosures, closet shelves, accessories, and other building products; and residential insulation services.

See Also: What is Compound Interest?

Earnings History and Estimates for TopBuild (NYSE:BLD)

Tuesday, March 5, 2019

Why Apple's Video-Streaming Service Is Taking So Long to Launch

Investors have been hearing rumblings about Apple's (NASDAQ:AAPL) forthcoming video-streaming service for years, with the first rumors emerging back in mid-2015. In the time since, the company has ramped up its budget, hired veteran TV execs from Sony, continued buying up TV and movie content, and officially acknowledged that it indeed has something in the pipeline. The service is expected to be unveiled in a matter of weeks.

We're now getting a better idea of why it's taking so long.

Apple tvOS interface displayed on a TV

Image source: Apple.

Apple's controlling ways

The New York Post reports that Apple's courting of Hollywood has been marred by overbearing executives that are out of their element, including CEO Tim Cook. The chief executive has even visited the production sets of shows in Vancouver and Los Angeles, according to the report. The Post's sources even went as far as to call Apple execs "intrusive," among other things.

Being family-friendly is core to Apple's brand, and it's been previously reported that the company wants approachable content. This stance has apparently created tension, with Cook supposedly sending notes like "don't be so mean!" to producers. It's highly unusual for a CEO to provide this level of granular feedback, but it should come as little surprise, as Apple has always been a control freak. The approach that has worked so well in integrating hardware and software to make high-tech gadgets doesn't quite lend itself as well to producing creative content.

Meanwhile, Apple is also changing the technical aspects of the service. Overall, these factors are all contributing to delays, as the company has had to push back the launch schedule numerous times as a result.

Hands-on vs. hands-off

Apple's domineering ways are in stark contrast to Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), which has adopted a famously hands-off approach to producing content. For example, in a 2015 Reddit Ask Me Anything session, Aziz Ansari pointed to creative freedom as one reason why he picked Netflix for his award-winning show Master of None. "We pitched only to premium spots cause we didn't want to deal with content issues," Ansari wrote. "On Netflix, we never had one issue with content."

CEO Reed Hastings exerts virtually no influence on daily content decisions, even as the video streamer becomes increasingly reliant on original content, which now drives the bulk of costs while simultaneously generating interest among subscribers. Of course, with the sheer quantity of original content that Netflix now produces, it wouldn't be practical for Hastings to send feedback to every showrunner.

Apple should take some cues from Netflix's creative process.

Getting to 500 million

If Apple wants its video-streaming service to make a dent in the intensely competitive market for your attention, it should relinquish creative control. The company may have deep pockets and a long time horizon, but the worst thing it could do is stifle creativity in a new service.

After all, the Mac maker has now publicly set a goal of hitting 500 million paid subscriptions at some point next year, and first-party services will play a meaningful role in getting there. "We're also very interested in adding new services that can provide great value to our customers in the future," CFO Luca Maestri said on the last earnings call. "And we don't want to get into product announcements here, but obviously that is part of our strategy."

Monday, March 4, 2019

Human and Animal Nutrition Drive Growth for Balchem to End 2018

Balchem's (NASDAQ:BCPC) fourth-quarter 2018 results, reported this week, showed continued solid revenue and earnings growth. Notably, the specialty-ingredients supplier achieved growth this year without the benefit of large acquisitions, which have helped results in the past. 

Here's a look at the highlights from the quarter and where there's strength (and weakness) in the business. 

Supplements in several forms (tablet, capsule, softgel) on a table.

Image source: Getty Images.

Balchem: The raw numbers Metric Q4 2018 Q4 2017 Year-Over-Year Change
Sales $163.5 million $159.3 million  2.7% 
Net income $20.3 million  $42.0 million  (51.6%) 
Adjusted EPS $0.77  $0.68  13.2% 

Data source: Balchem Q4 2018 earnings release. EPS = earnings per share. 

What happened with Balchem this quarter? 

Steady growth continues for Balchem, driven by its largest segments, animal and human health. Here's a look at the segment results and why there was a big drop in net income last quarter. 

The net income number you see above is down from a year ago because of a one-time benefit from the tax cuts passed in late 2017. On an adjusted basis, net income was up 14.9% year over year to $25.1 million for the quarter.  Human nutrition and health segment sales rose 4.8% to $87.2 million, and earnings from operations were up 2% to $12.3 million. Strong demand for powder and flavor products for food and beverage drove higher sales, but rising raw materials costs hurt earnings.  Animal nutrition and health sales rose 5.7% to $47.1 million as ruminant species volumes rose. Earnings from operations fell from $8.1 million a year ago to $7 million on lower volumes and margins in Europe.  Specialty product sales were up 6.2% to $17.6 million as demand rose in the ethylene oxide market. Earnings from operations rose $1 million, to $5.8 million.  Industrial product sales fell 22.2% to $11.6 million, and earnings rose 6.7% to $2.2 million. Weak demand in the fracking market led to a drop in sales. 

Free cash flow in the quarter was $33.6 million, and for the full year was $99.5 million, up 19.8% from a year ago. 

What management had to say

CEO Ted Harris praised the company's results and indicated that the economic backdrop wasn't very favorable to the company: "We ended the year with a solid fourth quarter, highlighted by record fourth-quarter sales, adjusted net earnings, and free cash flow. These results once again highlight the strength and resilience of our business model in what has proved to be a challenging business environment."

The one weak performer was the industrial segment, which felt a sting from slower fracking demand. But that's a business that tends to go up and down quarter to quarter, so results may pick up in 2019 if oil prices rise. In the meantime, positive earnings was good news for the segment. 

Looking forward

The diverse product line has helped Balchem report solid results despite segment fluctuations quarter to quarter. With the healthy amount of cash being generated and only $156 million of debt on the balance sheet, the company could make more acquisitions in 2019. At the very least, the company is well positioned for strong earnings again next year. 

Sunday, March 3, 2019

Atlantica Yield plc (AY) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Atlantica Yield plc  (NASDAQ:AY)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 28, 2019, 4:30 p.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Welcome to Atlantica's Fourth Quarter 2018 Financial Results Conference Call. Atlantica is a sustainable total return company that owns a diversified portfolio of contracted renewable energy, power generation, electric transmission and water assets in North and South America and certain markets in EMEA.

Just a reminder, that this call is being webcast live on the Internet, and a replay of this call will be available at the Atlantica Yield's corporate website. Atlantica will be making forward-looking statements during this call based on current expectations and assumptions, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from our forward-looking statements if any of our key assumptions are incorrect or because of other factors discussed in today's earnings presentation or the comments made during this conference call, in the Risk Factors section of the accompanying presentation, on our latest reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, each of which can be found on our website. Atlantica Yield does not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statements.

Joining us for today's conference call is Atlantica's CEO Santiago Seage, and CFO, Francisco Martinez-Davis. As usual, at the end of the conference call, we will open up the lines for the Q&A session.

I will now pass over to Mr. Seage. Please sir, go ahead.

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Thank you very much. Good afternoon and thank you for joining the call today. We are going to start on Slide number Three, with the key messages. We have delivered very strong operating results in 2018, meeting our EBITDA on our CAFD guidance once again. Our revenues for the year were $1,044 million, an increase of 4% compared with our 2017 revenues.

And further adjusted EBITDA, including unconsolidated affiliates increased by 9%, up to $859 million. Cash available for distribution, CAFD was in 2018 $172 million. In addition, our Board of Directors has declared a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share, representing an increase of 19% compared with the fourth period of 2017, or a 3% increase versus the previous quarter. Regarding DPS growth, we maintain our strategy and we maintain our targets.

And finally, as you know, we have recently formed a Strategic Review Board committee with the objective of evaluating strategic alternatives available to Atlantica to optimize the value of the company and to improve returns to shareholders. The committee has been mandated to review a wide range of alternatives and to make proposals in this regard to the Board. The committee just started working, and we therefore will not be able to enter into many more details.

If we start by reviewing our results on Page Six, we can see there revenues in 2018 versus 2017, as I said, a 4% increase, further adjusted EBITDA including unconsolidated affiliates up by 9% and CAFD close to a $172 million.

In summary, we are very pleased with the strong results achieved in the year. We have made our guidance this year as well demonstrating the solid operating performance of Atlantica and the advantage of having a diversified portfolio with a significant percentage of our revenue is based on availability, and not only on generation.

Let's move to Page Seven, where we see that overall the portfolio delivered a solid performance in 2018, both by sector and by region. By region, in America, both revenues and EBITDA have increased with respect to the previous year. It is important to mention the strong performance of our U.S. solar assets with increased production in Solana and Mojave reaching the highest yearly combined production ever, on a capacity factor of more than 28% in 2018.

In South America, revenues increased by 2%, thanks to a solid performance of our assets once again. EBITDA decreased year-on-year due to the $10 million one-off impact we had in 2017. Without taking into consideration that effect, EBITDA in South America would have also increased by a 2%, in line with revenues.

If we look at our EMEA region, revenues increased by 2%, thanks to higher production in our solar plant in South Africa, Kaxu. We have also benefit from the appreciation of euro against the dollar. And regarding EBITDA, this metric has benefited from the same effect.

If we look at the results by business sector we can see similar trends. Renewable energy revenues increased by a 2%, thanks to higher revenues throughout the portfolio with the exception of Spain, where production in 2018 decreased due to lower solar radiation. Although, the economic effect is limited, thanks to the fact that the high percentage of the revenues are based on availability.

Kaxu in South Africa delivered a very strong operating performance in 2018, reaching a capacity factor of 36% compared with a 25% in the previous year. In efficient natural gas, our asset continues to show excellent performance. The EBITDA decreased is simply due to a scheduled major overhaul at the beginning of the year -- of this year since operation and maintenance costs are typically higher in the quarters, prior to a major maintenance.

In transmission lines, revenues remained stable, while the variation in EBITDA corresponds to the one-off in 2017. It is also worth mentioning that the transmission lines acquired recently and the acquisitions announced recently had no contribution in 2018. Finally, our water segment keeps showing a strong EBITDA performance.

On Page Eight, key operation on metrics, we see that electricity produced by our renewable assets reached over 3,000 gigawatt hours in the year, slightly below the production generated in 2017, mostly due again to lower solar production in Spain, because of lower radiation. On the other hand, solar assets in the US and South Africa had a very strong performance in 2018.

Finally, our wind assets generated production broadly similar to what they did in 2017.

Our third wind asset, acquisition was closed in mid-December, and therefore the contribution in 2018 was very limited. Overall, our renewable energy assets delivered, what we believe is a strong operating performance in 2018.

If we now look at our availability based assets, we see that ACT keeps showing very strong consistent performance, with high availability and our transmission lines and water assets have also shown very high availabilities once more.

I will now turn the call over to Francisco, who will take you through the financial figures.

Francisco Martinez-Davis -- Chief Financial Officer

Thank you, Santiago, and good afternoon everyone. Let's move on to Slide Nine to walk through our cash flow for the year 2018. Our operating cash flow reached $401 million, improving 4% from 2017. This was mainly due to better operating results and lower interest payments.

Net cash used in investing activities amounted to $14.9 million of which $73.2 million correspond to acquisition previously announced, including the acquisition of Melowind, our third asset in South America. The first payment related to ATN Expansion 1 transmission line, the acquisition of a mini-hydro electric plant in Peru earlier in the year and the acquisition of Chile Transmission Line 3.

Also as we discussed in the first quarter call, this figure includes $67.9 million, we received in Solana from Abengoa, mostly in March in relation to the DOE consent, which was mainly used to repay project debt.

Net cash used in financing activities in 2018 amounted to $405 million and corresponded mainly to the scheduled repayments of principal of our financing agreement as well as the debt repayments by Solana using the proceeds received from Abengoa. We also paid $143 million of dividends to shareholders and non-controlling interest.

On the next slide, number 10, we would like to review our net debt position. We have significantly reduced our consolidated debt in 2018. We closed 2018 with a net corporate debt of $577.4 million, after having paid part of the acquisition's closed in December 2018. With this, our net corporate debt to CAPD pre-corporate debt service ratio stood at 2.7 times below our internal target of three times. On the other hand, net project debt from December 31, 2018 was 4,566 million, which represents almost a 400 million reduction versus December 2017.

I will now turn the call back to Santiago, who will go over the strategic update and provide further details on our commitment to DPS and the guidance for 2019.

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Thank you, Francisco. On Slide 12, we can review how we are delivering on our commitment to grow our dividends, obviously priority for us. First of all, our Board of Directors has approved a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share for the fourth quarter of 2018. This means an increase of 19% compared to the fourth quarter of 2017 and an increase of 3% compared with the previous quarterly dividend, business as usual.

As you can see on the chart, we have made or we have significantly increased quarter-over-quarter our dividends during the last years. As a result, the total dividend per share for the year 2018 has been $1.39, a 25% more than in 2017. And with the fourth quarter dividend, our annualized dividend is now $1.48 per share. Demonstrating the confidence, we have in our business and in our growth prospects, including our mid-term guidance.

Finally, before concluding our presentation today, I would like to share with you our guidance for the year 2019 on Page 13. We are now estimating our 2019 further adjusted EBITDA in the range of $820 million to $870 million and we are estimating our 2019 CAFD guidance in the range of $180 million to $200 million.

Our guidance for 2018, reflects our expectation for the year including the contribution from our Mojave project, estimated at $30 million to $35 million of CAFD within the CAFD guidance for the year. As you know, PG&E, the off-taker in our Mojave asset filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 on January 29, 2019. This week PG&E made the first payment for power delivered to them by our Mojave plant after January 29, as per the contract. For us, and as of today, Mojave operates normally, business as usual.

In our guidance, we do not expect distributions from the asset until Q4 2019 and we therefore have time to work with our lender as the situation develops. But we want to be clear, even the 2019 distributions were delayed in the future, our current intention is to remain committed to dividend and to DPS, dividend per share growth, given our current payout ratio. In other words, Atlantica was designed for situations like this one. Diversification, non-recourse finance and a reasonable payout ratio are there to allow us to navigate through situations like this one. And this is what we plan to do.

In summary, your Board and your management remains fully committed to dividend and DPS growth.

Thank you for your attention. We will now open the lines for questions. Operator, we are ready for Q&A.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Thank you very much, sir. (Operator Instructions) Our first question today is from Julien Dumoulin-Smith from Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Anya Shelekhin -- Bank of America -- Analyst

Hi, this is Anya filling in for Julien.

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Hi Anya.

Anya Shelekhin -- Bank of America -- Analyst

Hi. So, I guess, first up, to start, I just wanted to get some of your thoughts maybe the latest update on discussions with the DOE? And then your thoughts on the possibility of receiving some sort of waiver for our distributions at Mojave?

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

So, regarding discussions with our lender, we see in the case of Mojave, DOE, at this point in time, it's too early in the process to be able to report much. As you know, we have extensive experience in similar situations, and therefore we feel reasonably comfortable that we know, how to deal with the situation and that we have our lender that will be reasonable and supportive, irrespective of what happens in the future.

In the case of Mojave and DOE, our expectation is that between now and the end of the year, we will be able to work with our lender and be able to find the solution depending on the events, obviously, finding a solution that would allow us to make a distribution. In any case as I mentioned in the call, even if that distribution was delayed, our strategy doesn't change and our DPS policy doesn't change.

Anya Shelekhin -- Bank of America -- Analyst

Okay. Thanks. And just a follow-up again on Mojave. In terms of the dividend growth, I just wanted to get a sense of your commitment to DPS growth there? Is that more in terms of a long-term growth target? Or, could there be some growth for 2019 as well? And just your expectations for being able to achieve that during 2019?

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

So, our expectation, what we're saying is that, we are maintaining the guidance we have given regarding mid-term growth and we plan to do it, if you want gradually. So, we expect that every year, we'll be able to increase our dividend, and we expect that the Mojave/PG&E situation will not represent a change. Of course, assuming that events develop in the way we think they should develop.

Anya Shelekhin -- Bank of America -- Analyst

Okay, thanks. And on the 2019 CAFD guidance you provided, what are your assumptions there for CAFD contributions from Solana and Kaxu?

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

So, in the case of Solana, we are not expecting distributions in the rest of the assets with respect to distributions, and we have built for all the other assets reasonable assumptions regarding those distributions included Kaxu.

Anya Shelekhin -- Bank of America -- Analyst

Okay, great. That's all from me.

Operator

Our next question today is from the line of Praful Mehta from Citigroup. Please go ahead.

Praful Mehta -- Citigroup -- Analyst

Thanks so much. Hi guys.

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Hi, there.

Praful Mehta -- Citigroup -- Analyst

Hi. So, maybe just following up on Mojave a little bit, clearly the -- it sounds like any decision on the bankruptcy and rejection of contract and the discussion with DOE will take some time. So, if you don't have a decision from DOE, and PG&E hasn't taken a decision, and you still have uncertainty and you're moving into, let's say, 2020.

I'm assuming it's difficult to continue to increase the payout. So, you would have to take a decision at some point on what you want to do with the dividend. So, how should we think about the timing of a dividend decision, if there continues to be uncertainty around, how Mojave and PG&E play out?

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

So, the message we are sharing with you is that, with a current payout we have, we believe that we have enough room to continue, let's say, growing our dividend in a reasonable way, but growing our dividend even if the uncertainty you describe lasts beyond this year. So, could we have higher payout ratio temporary because of that? Yes. But that's, as I said before, that's why we were designed to have a reasonable payout to be able to temporary increase it, if need it.

Having said that, again we have plenty of time between now and end of the year, we do not plan our dividend before the end of the year and therefore we will be able to work with our lender, with our client to find solutions before then, and we are not in a rush whatsoever. And we have a lender that has proven to be supportive in the past and who has several projects, not only us with PG&E and who we believe will be a good partner in the developments we will be facing in the coming months.

Praful Mehta -- Citigroup -- Analyst

Got you. Fair enough. Maybe just a second question on the strategic review, because that sounds clearly interesting in terms of -- it sounds like its pretty broad in terms of scope. It could include, I'm assuming asset sales or getting some other owner on equity basis. If you could just give us some context of what is the width or breadth of the review on the strategic side? And is that connected with Mojave? And then do you need to do something strategically to avoid kind of any payout issues further down the road? Or, these two completely disconnected?

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

So, I don't think that it has to do with Mojave. The decision to create a strategic review committee is coming from our Board, who I believe has done what is normal, meaning as a Board, when we feel that there is a disconnect or a large gap between the value of the business and the price in the market of the business, I believe that responsibly the Board has decided to create a committee to review as you mention, a broad set of options to increase the value of the company because that obviously is very important for us as management and as Board. And therefore, we proactively decided to take the step of -- we reviewing all options and putting together our plan to make sure that we can maximize the value of the company. And that's the reasoning and I think that it's a proactive step to do it at this point in time, without the any real reason more than the gap between what we consider is the value and the price.

Praful Mehta -- Citigroup -- Analyst

That's great. Definitely I appreciate the proactive measures on the strategic review. So, thanks so much. I appreciate it.

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Thank you.

Operator

Our next question today is from David Quezada from Raymond James. Please go ahead.

David Quezada -- Raymond James -- Analyst

Thanks. Hi, everyone. My first question here just related to Mexico, I know, that there's been some fuel theft issues and supply disruptions in certain part of the country. I'm just wondering if you can talk about or just confirm that you don't have any exposure there? And talk about how that colors your view on potentially deploying capital there in the future?

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

So, these don't affect us in any way. Our asset in Mexico receives natural gas from the client, who has a facility nearby, and there have been no operational issues there, nothing to do with the situation you described.

Going forward Mexico, as you know, there is a new government since late 2018, our point of view regarding Mexico continued being supportive. We believe there are significant opportunities locally in our markets and our intention or our view over the market continued being positive and we continue analyzing a number of opportunities, and obviously we will monitor the evolution of the market from that point of view.

David Quezada -- Raymond James -- Analyst

Okay, great. Thank you. And then, wondering if you can provide any just broad comments on -- with some of the investments you've made recently. How you feel about your availability of growth capital currently and the outlook there?

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

So, and we have announced that, you know, a number of acquisitions, many of them have been closed already, and others we are in the process of closing now. And we continue analyzing many of those acquisitions. We continue seeing attractive areas, where we can deploy capital at reasonable returns, and how to finance that. We are working on a number of options and as part of that is, where we want to make sure that, we have a competitive cost of capital and obviously the initiative of a strategic review committee is part of that, how to ensure that our cost of capital is going to be competitive by looking at all the options.

David Quezada -- Raymond James -- Analyst

Okay, great. Thanks. That's all I have for now. I'll get back in the queue.

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Thank you, David.

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Our next question is from Abe Azar from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Abe Azar -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Good afternoon.

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Hi Abe.

Abe Azar -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Hi. With your EBITDA up 10% year-over-year, and the leverage down 10%, do you see any opportunities to relever or refinance, as a potential source of capital?

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Do you want to take this one Francisco?

Francisco Martinez-Davis -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes. I'll take this one. You'll see there that we have both the holding company leverage at 2.7 and the debt has decreased by 400 million with operating company. So, to one of the levers we set that we always look, Abe, is to be able to refinance some of the assets in the portfolio and that is something that during 2019, we refinance two assets in the portfolio in Spain and we're actively looking for other opportunities to create value by refinancing other of the operating assets that we have in the portfolio. That is something that we're looking.

And with regards to holding company, as Santiago mentioned, how important it is to have the lowest cost of capital, but that component is important to that. So, we are also looking at one of the best alternatives to finance the growth component of future growth.

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

And in fact, Abe, I mean, the reason why we are confident following the question we have before from David and putting it together with yours. The reason, why we feel confident about being able to deploy more capital in future is because we have a number of sources. We have a number of levers including the one you mention, clearly in our portfolio as large as ours by refinancing assets or by financing the company. In other ways, we believe we can free up capital to do a number of new investments and that's part of the kind of initiatives we'll be looking at and another things Francisco and his team are working on.

Abe Azar -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Got it. Thank you.

Operator

Currently, there are no further questions waiting, sir.

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Okay, thank you very much to everybody for joining us today. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you very much, sir. Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude the conference for today. Thank you all for participating. You may now disconnect your lines.

Duration: 31 minutes

Call participants:

Santiago Seage -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Francisco Martinez-Davis -- Chief Financial Officer

Anya Shelekhin -- Bank of America -- Analyst

Praful Mehta -- Citigroup -- Analyst

David Quezada -- Raymond James -- Analyst

Abe Azar -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

More AY analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.